Legal Opinion

Stanulonis v. Marzec

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided December 30, 1986No. 3:93-r-00039PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DORSEY, District Judge.

Facts

On September 25, 1982, the defendant, Michael Marzec, a Connecticut State Trooper, was monitoring traffic by use of radar on Routes 2 and 11. At approximately 8:45 p.m., Marzec observed the plaintiff speeding at what Marzec claims was 73 miles per hour. Investigation Report at 1; Marzec deposition at 9. Marzec left his position and began to chase plaintiff. Two to three and one-half miles later he activated his emergency lights. Marzec deposition at 14. The parties disagree as to whether Marzec ever activated his siren. It is…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Welch v. Cadre CapitalDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1990
  2. Ipsen v. Diamond Tree ExpertsUtah Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Wills v. FerrandinoDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1993
  4. Horta v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  5. Horta v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API