Legal Opinion · Dissent

DeJarnette v. Federal Kemper Insurance

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 1, 1984No. 15, September Term, 1983Published

1DissentEldridge, Judge

I agree with the majority that Maryland Code (1957, 1979 Repl.VoL, 1983 Cum.Supp.), Art. 48A, § 545(b), authorizes an insurer to exclude so-called personal injury protection coverage for injuries sustained by a passenger on a motorcycle. On the other hand, I believe that the Federal Kemper policy at issue in this case failed to do so. In my view the term “use of a motorcycle” in the policy provision, as applied to a passenger exercising no control over the vehicle, is ambiguous. The ambiguity should be resolved against Federal Kemper as the party which drafted the policy. I would, therefore,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. LeJeune v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. PryseskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. Truck Insurance Exchange v. Marks Rentals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  4. Travelers Insurance Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Government Employees Insurance v. DeJamesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API