Legal Opinion

Fraler v. Sears Union Water Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1859PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Fourteenth District, County of Sierra. This was an action for damages resulting from the careless and negligent construction of a dam by the defendants, across a stream, and the consequent injury therefrom, to the plaintiffs’ mining claim. The plaintiffs had judgment in the Court below, and the defendants appealed. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

This was an action for injuries to naming claims, and loss of gold-bearing earth, occasioned by the negligent building of defendants’ dam across and over a ravine, upon which the plaintiffs’ claims were located —the claims being above the dam. The injury is charged to have rusulted to the plaintiff, from the careless construction of the dam, and a reservoir, whereby the gold-bearing earth of the plaintiffs was washed away by the water and lost, and other injuries done to their mining claims and property.

The defendants demurred to the complaint, and assigned several technical causes of…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Okmulgee Gas Co. v. KellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Marine Ins. v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas · 1890
  3. Central, Trust Co. v. Wabash, St. L. & P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1893
  4. Western Gas Const. Co. v. DannerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
  5. Los Angeles Pressed Brick Co. v. HigginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API