Legal Opinion
Rideout v. Gardner
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided September 28, 2016No. 15-2021PPublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LYNCH, Circuit Judge.
In 2014, New' Hampshire amended a statute meant to avoid vote buying and voter intimidation by newly forbidding citizens from photographing their marked ballots and publicizing such photographs. While the photographs need not show the voter, they often do and are commonly referred to as “ballot selfies.” The statute imposes a fine of up to $1,000 for a violation of the prohibition. See N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 659:35, IV; id. § 651:2, IV(a).'
- Three New Hampshire citizens who are under investigation for violation of the revised statute, and who are represented by the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Reed v. Town of GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- United States v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Pitta v. MedeirosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2024
- Joel Crookston v. Ruth JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Signs for Jesus v. Pembroke, NHCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- Project Veritas Action Fund v. RollinsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- United States v. TothCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.