Legal Opinion
Joel Crookston v. Ruth Johnson
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 28, 2016No. 16-2490PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUTTON, J., delivered the decision of the court in which GUY, J., joined. GUY, J. (pp. 401-02), delivered a separate concurrence. COLE, C.J. (pp. 402-05), delivered a separate dissent.
ORDER
SUTTON, Circuit Judge.
One hundred and twenty-five years ago, Michigan enacted a law designed to protect the secret ballot by forbidding voters from exposing their marked ballots to others. Nine years ago, Apple introduced a cell phone capable of taking photographs and uploading them’ to the Internet. Thirty-two days ago, Joel Crookston sought a preliminary injunction to prevent the State from enforcing the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Burson v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Purcell v. GonzalezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Operating Engineers Local 324 Health Care Plan v. G & W Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Connection Distributing Co. v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Ralph Nader v. J. Kenneth Blackwell, Ohio Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Emily Dahl v. Bd. of Trs. of W. Mich. Univ.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. CortésDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Tenn.Conference of the NAACP v. William LeeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
- Stein v. CortésDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Donald Trump v. Wisconsin Elections CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.