Lail v. United States Government
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are nine motions to dismiss the plaintiffs’ second amended complaint. Those motions were filed, respectively, by the following defendants or groups of defendants: (1) Kathy Beers, Jennifer Brewton, David Caldwell, Larry Gainey, Princess Hodges, Horry County, Mark Keel, John Morgan, Palmetto Health Care, Mike Prodon, the South Carolina Department of Social Services, the State of South Carolina, the State of South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, Susan Stroman, Suzanne Tillman, and John Weaver (“the South Carolina defendants”);…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jordon v. QuanderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Byrne v. Clinton FoundationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Krstafer Pinkerton, et al. v. Debra Reinhardt, et al.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2026
- Pinkerton v. ReinhardtDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026