Legal Opinion
Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 29, 2009No. 08-2820PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Revin Rasten appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to defendant Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corporation (“Saint-Gobain”). Rasten claims that the district court erred in its interpretation of the Fair Labor Standards Act when it determined that Rasten had not suffered retaliation within the meaning of the statute. For the reasons explained below, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
I. Background
Defendant Saint-Gobain is a corporation that manufactures a variety of high-performance materials at facilities throughout the country.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pamela Kotcher and Barbara Davis, Pamela Kotcher v. Rosa and Sullivan Appliance Center, Inc., and Herbert TrageserCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Greathouse v. JHS Security Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Edwards v. AH Cornell and Son, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Minor v. Bostwick Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Maynor v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.