Legal Opinion
Cohen v. TIC Financial Systems (In Re Ampace Corp.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware
Decided May 3, 2002No. 19-50100PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PETER J. WALSH, Chief Judge.
Before the court is the motion (Doc. # 13) of Comdata Network, Inc. f/k/a TIC Financial Systems (“Comdata” or “Defendant”) for summary judgment. I will deny the motion for the reasons discussed below.
BACKGROUND
Ampace Corporation and Ampace Freightlines, Inc. (collectively, “Debtors”) filed voluntary petitions for relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on December 15, 1998 (“Petition Date”). On December 3, 1999 (“Confirmation Date”), Debtors’ Fourth Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization (“Plan”) was confirmed. (See Confirmation Order (Doc. #…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Alary Corp. v. Sims (In Re Associated Vintage Group, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Fleet National Bank v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Katz v. I.A. Alliance Corp. (In Re I. Appel Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Kmart Corp. v. Intercraft Co. (In Re Kmart Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
- Elk Horn Coal Co. v. Conveyor Manufacturing & Supply, Inc. (In Re Pen Holdings, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2004
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.