Legal Opinion

State v. Greenwood

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 27, 2001No. D9805149T; A106076PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Defendant was charged with driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), ORS 813.010, and moved to suppress the results of an Intoxilyzer test that he took shortly after his arrest. The trial court granted defendant’s motion to suppress, and the state appeals. ORS 138.060(3). Defendant asserted, and the trial court agreed, that defendant had not been afforded a reasonable opportunity to consult with an attorney before deciding whether to take the Intoxilyzer test. The state appeals, arguing that defendant was afforded a reasonable opportunity to consult with an attorney and alternatively…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Krummacher v. GierloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. CavanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API