Legal Opinion

State v. Sefrit

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1914No. 11692PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for What-com county, Pemberton, J., entered May 26, 1913, upon a trial and conviction of criminal libel.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

The defendant was tried for criminal libel, upon an amended information, the substance of which was as follows :

“Defendant at Bellingham, Washington, on or about the 12th day of January, 1913, did then and there compose, print and publish in the Sunday American-Reveille a certain editorial as follows, to wit:
“ ‘Why Does Prosecutor Defend a Rapist?
“ ‘Many of the people of Whatcom county are wondering if they are not misplacing their confidence when they repose *525it in Frank W. Bixby as a conscientious and unbiased official.
“ ‘The action of Bixby in the case of Walter Fulcher, self-confessed…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Dorr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Johnson v. BrownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Commonwealth v. ClapMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  4. People of the State of N.Y. v. . DohringNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  5. Detroit Daily Post Co. v. McArthurMichigan Supreme Court · 1868

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Wilson v. Sun Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Ecuyer v. New York Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Graham v. Star Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. State v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API