Legal Opinion

Clark v. Carey

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1878PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Erom the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

Sylvanus Carey sued Nathan C. Clark and George Teter jointly, on a promissory note, as follows :

“ $2,400.00. Indianapolis, Ind., Jan. 20th, 1877.
“Twenty days after date, we promise to pay to the order of Sylvanus Carey twenty-four hundred dollars, and ten per cent attorney’s fees if suit be instituted on this note, negotiable and payable at Eletcher’s bank, value received, without any relief whatever from valuation or appraisement laws, with interest at ten per cent, per annum, from date, which has been paid to maturity. The •drawers and endorsers severally waive presentment for payment,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Walker v. WoollenIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Indianapolis Piano Manufacturing Co. v. CavenIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Porter v. HollowayIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Burroughs v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fordyce v. NelsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Grimes v. TaitSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Union Trust Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Light v. KillingerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API