Light v. Killinger

Killinger sued appellants, Light and Dixon, upon a promissory note, alleged to have been executed by Light to Dixon, and by Dixon endorsed to Killinger. Dixon and Light each filed a separate answer in two paragraphs, the first of which was the general denial, and the second set up a material alteration of the note. The appellee replied by general denial. The cause was submitted for trial *103to the court. When the evidence was closed the appellants filed a demurrer thereto, which was overruled and an exception reserved to the ruling. The sole assignment of error presents the question of the…