Legal Opinion
Wesley Jessen Corp. v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided April 3, 2003No. Civ.A. 01-294-KAJPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JORDAN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Wesley Jessen Corporation (“Wesley Jessen”) moves the Court for an order to show cause why defendant Bausch & Lomb, Inc. (“Bausch & Lomb”) should not be held in civil contempt for violating the terms of a Court imposed injunction (see Docket Item [“D.I.”] 179 at 7-8, D.I. 180 at ¶ 1) prohibiting Bausch & Lomb from further infringing Wesley Jessen’s U.S. Patent No. 4,711,943 (issued Dec. 8, 1987) (the “ ’943 patent”). (D.I.182.) In conjunction with its motion, Wesley Jessen seeks an order permitting discovery into the allegedly…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- The Akro Corporation v. Ken LukerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. Minnesota Moline Plow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- The Johns Hopkins University, Baxter Healthcare Corporation and Becton Dickinson and Company v. Cellpro, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- 3D Systems, Inc. v. Aarotech Laboratories, Inc., Aaroflex, Inc. And Albert C. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wing Shing Products (BVI), Ltd. v. Simatelex Manufactory Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co. v. Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2007
- SEB, SA v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- CLS Bank International v. Alice Corp. Pty.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. v. Stena Drilling Ltd.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.