Woodward v. South Carolina Farm Bureau Insurance
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Justice:
South Carolina Farm Bureau Insurance Company appeals a verdict against it in a libel and slander action instituted by respondent W. McGill Woodward. Farm Bureau alleges that the trial judge erred by finding the communications libelous and slanderous per se and not protected by privilege; failure to submit the issue of liability to the jury is assigned as error. Farm Bureau also contends that the admission of *31certain matter as competent evidence was erroneous and prejudicial. While we find no error in the trial judge’s handling of the broader issue of liability, we find that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Industrial Welding Supplies, Inc. v. Atlas Vending Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- Capps v. WattsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Fulton v. Atlantic Coast Line R. CoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
- Long v. ConroySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
- Holmes v. Curtis Publishing CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Swinton Creek Nursery v. Edisto Farm CreditSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Murray, v. Holnam, Inc. and Thomas Thornton, of Whom Holnam, Inc. IsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- Abofreka v. Alston Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
- Austin v. Torrington Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Constant v. Spartanburg Steel Products, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.