Legal Opinion

Capps v. Watts

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 3, 1978No. 20734PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rhodes, Justice:

This appeal involving an action for libel is from an order of the lower court overruling the defendant’s demurrer to the complaint. The defendant contends that his reference to the plaintiff as a “paranoid sonofabitch” does not, on its face, give rise to a cause of action, the words being simply words of abuse and scurrility. He further asserts that, even if these words can be construed as libelous by reason of extrinsic circumstances, they are not actionable without the pleading of special damage and that the plaintiff has failed to plead such special damage as is legally…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Piedmont Canteen Service, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Riley v. Askin & Marine Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  3. McGregor v. State Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
  4. Galloway v. CoxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  5. Costas v. Florence Printing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Holtzscheiter v. Thomson Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. GellertDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Austin v. Torrington Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
  4. Goodwin v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  5. Parrish v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API