Legal Opinion

Murray, v. Holnam, Inc. and Thomas Thornton, of Whom Holnam, Inc. Is

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 8, 2001No. 3283PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Judge:

John Murray appeals from an order of the Circuit Court granting summary judgment to his former employer, Holnam, Inc., as to Murray’s slander cause of action. We reverse and remand.

FACTSIPROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Holnam operates a cement plant near Holly Hill, South Carolina. The plant includes a quarry which houses a large diesel fuel storage tank. Holnam hired Murray in 1989 as a control room operator. Murray’s responsibilities involved operating cement-mixing machinery. Michael Smoak supervised Murray’s shift. When Smoak was absent, Murray acted as the relief supervisor.

While…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Baird v. Charleston CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Swinton Creek Nursery v. Edisto Farm CreditSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  5. Staubes v. City of Folly BeachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. City of GreenvilleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  2. Rife v. Hitachi Const. MacHinery Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  3. Jones v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  4. Parrish v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  5. Mulherin-Howell v. CobbCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API