Legal Opinion

Gilman v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 8, 1924No. 3070PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

First indicating that no question of the jurisdiction of the District Court under the Tucker Act (24 Stat. 505) has been raised or decided, we affirm the judgment of that court on the opinion of the learned trial judge (290 Fed. 614), later fortified by the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Helmholz v. Horst, 294 Fed. 417, affirming Horst v. United States (D. C.) 283 Fed. 600.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Helmholz v. HorstCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
  2. Horst v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. White v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. In Re Estate of PivonkaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  3. National Union Bank v. McNealSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  4. Newborn v. De WittTennessee Supreme Court · 1932