Carlson v. Schoch
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Ramsey county to recover $1,217 for conversion. The facts are stated in the opinion. The case was tried before Brill, J., and a jury which returned, a verdict in favor of Andrew Sehoch for $298.24 and against the Andrew Sehoch Grocery Company for $712.50. From an order denying their motion for a new trial, defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action in conversion. There was a verdict for the plaintiff against the defendant Sehoch Grocery Company and it appeals from the order denying its motion for a new trial.
1. This was an action against Andrew Sehoch and the Sehoch Grocery Company for the conversion of personal property, consisting of horses and equipment. The defendants answered separately.
The defendant Sehoch denied the conversion and counterclaimed upon certain notes secured by two chattel mortgages upon the property alleged to have been converted. The first of these was foreclosed after the alleged conversion but before the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cushing v. Seymour, Sabin & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Griffin v. BristleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Deal v. D. M. Osborne & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Berg v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Torp v. GulsethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hornblower & Weeks-Hemphill Noyes v. LazereSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Ferris, Baker Watts, Inc. v. Stephenson (In Re MJK Clearing, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2002
- Nieter v. McCaull-Dinsmore Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Maple Securities U.S.A. Inc. v. Stephenson (In Re MJK Clearing, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2002
- Crosby v. PaineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.