Deal v. D. M. Osborne & Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Traverse county, G. L. Brown, J., presiding, refusing a new trial, the action having been tried before Stearns, J., (acting for the judge of the 16th district,) and a jury.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
Action of replevin. The material facts were that defendants bought and held three chattel mortgages executed by plaintiff on six horses, to secure the payment of a note for $250 and interest, payable November 1, 1888, all of which contained stipulations, express or implied, that as long as the conditions of the^mortgages were fulfilled the mortgagor should remain in possession of the property. Bach of the mortgages also contained a provision that if any attempt should be made to dispose of the property, or if at any time the mortgagee should deem himself insecure, it should be lawful for him…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cushing v. Seymour, Sabin & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Torp v. GulsethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. Shevlin-Carpenter Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Scheifert v. BriegelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Berg v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Casper v. Regional Agricultural Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Richardson v. CoffmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.