Legal Opinion
Bartley v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 31, 1987No. 85-109, 85-1586PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEBEKER, Associate Judge:
Appellants George Bartley and Peter Hackett were charged in a six count indictment with armed robbery, D.C.Code §§ 22-2901, -3202 (1981), and two counts each of assault with intent to rob while armed, id. § 22-501. Each of the six counts was charged alternatively, it being alleged that appellants were armed with either a pistol, id. § 22-3202(a) or with a pistol or imitation thereof, id. They were found guilty of armed robbery while armed with an operable pistol, and two counts each of assault with a deadly weapon.1 On appeal, they claim that the trial court erred in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- United States v. Econuel Perry, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Warren v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Montgomery v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Willcher v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Thompson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Watson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Newman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- State v. CainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Peterson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.