Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Donovan

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 11, 1976PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeville, J.

In 1951 Peter and Mary Dalton recorded the subdivision plan of a tract of land in Chatham which is reproduced on the following page as figure l. In 1954

the plaintiffs, Arthur T. and Eileen M. Murphy, purchased from the Daltons lots 20, 22, and an “unnumbered parcel” (the locus) which is shown as the shaded area on figure 2. In 1964 the defendants Brendon Donovan and Miriam Horwitz acquired lots 16-19, 21, and 23 from the heirs of Peter Dalton. Late in the same year, as the result of a dispute concerning the boundary between lots 18 and 20, Mr. Murphy brought a bill in equity to enjoin Mr.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lolos v. BerlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  2. Goldstein v. BealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  3. Mt. Holyoke Realty Corp. v. Holyoke Realty Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  4. Board of Selectmen of Hatfield v. GarveyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  5. Orpin v. MorrisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sheftel v. LebelMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  2. Boudreau v. ColemanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
  3. Melrose Housing Authority v. New Hampshire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  4. Patel v. Planning Board of North AndoverMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  5. Patelle v. Planning Board of WoburnMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API