Legal Opinion

Beaver's Estate

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 14, 1920No. Appeal, No. 5PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, No. 5, March T., 1920, by Matthias Beaver and Simon Peter Beaver, heirs-at-law and administrators, from decree of O. C. Union County, Jan. T., 1918, No. 6, in the Estate of Daniel Beaver, deceased. Exceptions to auditor’s report. Before Johnson, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. The court dismissed the exceptions. Error assigned was the decree of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

Daniel Beaver was an old man, a childless widower, lining by himself, when seized by the illness which subsequently terminated in his death. The physician who attended him found him to be in bad condition and filthy and told him, in the presence of a friend, that he must be removed to some other place. The decedent expressed a desire to be taken to the home of Howard W. Baum, which was near, and his friend so informed Mr. and Mrs. Baum, who consented to receive him into their home. The deceased was then taken to the home of Mr. and Mrs. Baum and there he remained during…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lewis's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Appeal of RanningerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  3. Smith v. MilliganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862
  4. Curry v. CurrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  5. Griffith's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lach v. Fleth, Admr.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Allen, Exr. v. EtterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API