Griffith's Estate
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 33, July T., 1891, by Mary A. G. Nagle, from decree of C. P. No. 4, Sept. T., 1876, No. 219, dismissing exceptions to an auditor’s report. On January 13, 1890, the account of Andrew J. Griffith, trustee of the estate of James C. Griffith, was referred to George O. Horwitz, Esq., as auditor. From the testimony taken before the auditor, the facts appeared as stated in the opinion of the court below.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 33, July T., 1891, by Mary A. G. Nagle, from decree of C. P. No. 4, Sept. T., 1876, No. 219, dismissing exceptions to an auditor’s report. On January 13, 1890, the account of Andrew J. Griffith, trustee of the estate of James C. Griffith, was referred to George O. Horwitz, Esq., as auditor. From the testimony taken before the auditor, the facts appeared as stated in the opinion of the court below. The accountant filed the following exceptions to the auditor’s report: “ 3. The learned auditor erred in finding that under the deed of trust the trustee had no right to apply the corpus…
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam,
This decree is affirmed upon the opinion of the learned judge of the court below, and the appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.
2Cited by9 opinions
- Daniels v. Beryllium CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
- Maxwell v. CottleNew York Supreme Court · 1893
- Kipp's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Beaver's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- In Re Estate of FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.