Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1994No. CR-93-0340-PRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Memorandum Decision of the Court of Appeals, Division One filed June 1, 1993 vacated

FELDMAN, Chief Justice.

A jury convicted Defendant Robert Earl Johnson of one count of fraudulent scheme and artifice (hereinafter “fraud”). The trial court sentenced Defendant to concurrent terms of nine years for fraud and four years on an earlier conviction, for which he was on probation at the time he allegedly committed the fraud. By memorandum decision, the court of appeals affirmed. State v. Johnson, No. 1-CA-CR 91-0935 (June 1, 1993). We granted Defendant’s petition for review, believing that the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. MazeSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Kann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Parr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. FimbresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  2. State v. ProctorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  3. State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
  4. Sableen Sabnat v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  5. State of Arizona v. Javier FimbresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API