Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Breithbarth
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 29, 1932No. File No. 6074PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.
This case requires a definition of the phrase “residing in the district” as used in § 1343 of the Supplement which says: “The public schools provided for in this chapter (§§ 1105-1422 of the Compiled Laws of 1913) shall be at all times equally free, open and accessible to all children over six and under twenty-one years of age residing in the district.”
In the fall of 1931 Thelma Anderson was sixteen years of age. During the school year of 1930 and 1931 she attended the public schools of Wishek, within the defendant school district; but in the fall of 1931 the school board learned of facts…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Raymond v. LeishmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Yale v. West Middle School DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
- State ex rel. School District No. 1 of Waukesha v. ThayerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
- City of Enderlin v. Pontiac TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- McNish v. State ex rel. DimickNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- B.R.T. v. Executive Director of Social Service Board of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Special Education Division of the Department of Public Instruction v. G. H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Dietz v. City of MedoraNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Hallissey v. School Administrative District No. 77Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Wehrung v. Ideal School District No. 10North Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.