Legal Opinion
Dietz v. City of Medora
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 21, 1983No. Civ. 10297PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAULSON, Justice.
This is an appeal by Tom Dietz from a judgment dismissing his action against the City of Medora; Rod Tjaden, the mayor of Medora; and William Connell, a member of the Medora City Council. Dietz contends that Tjaden and Connell are not residents of Medora and, therefore, are not qualified to serve as city officers. We affirm the dismissal.
Tjaden is a division manager employed by the Gold Seal Company to oversee Gold Seal’s property and tourist facilities in Me-dora. When in Medora, Tjaden lives in a house provided by the Gold Seal Company. During September through March,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hoge v. Burleigh County Water Management DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Sathre v. MoodieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
- Schillerstrom v. SchillerstromNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
- Bergstrom Ex Rel. Bergstrom v. BergstromNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Goodsell v. State Automobile & Casualty UnderwritersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- B.R.T. v. Executive Director of Social Service Board of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Matter of Estate of BurshiemNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. RubeyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Red River State Bank v. ReiersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Berg v. JaegerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.