Fruehauf Corporation v. Royal Exchange Assurance of America, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JAMESON, District Judge:
Appellant, Fruehauf Corporation, brought this action against appellee, Royal Exchange Assurance of America, Inc., under a casualty insurance policy issued by Royal to Pacific Far East Lines (PFEL). Fruehauf seeks indemnification for its security interest in eight tractors sold by Fruehauf to PFEL under an installment sales contract (chattel mortgage) that required PFEL to insure the tractors against loss. Following discovery and submission of affidavits, documents and memoranda by both parties, the district court granted Royal’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm.
I.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jaffke v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Ornellas v. OakleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Russell v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Long v. KellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Woody v. Lytton Savings & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1964
3Cited by23 opinions
- Marcus T. Baumann v. Arizona Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Schultz v. SundbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Schultz v. SundbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Operating Engineers Pension Trust v. Beck Engineering & Surveying Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Golden State Transit Corporation a California Corporation v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.