Legal Opinion

Murphy v. City of High Point

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 11, 1940PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRaeNhill, J.

Counsel properly concede that the decision of the question presented is made to turn upon the correct interpretation of the opinion in Cecil v. High Point, 165 N. C., 431, 81 S. E., 616. The defendant contends that under said decision the proper venue for the trial of this cause is in Guilford County. The plaintiffs contend that under a proper construction of the language used by the Court in that case the proper venue is in Davidson County where plaintiffs’ land is situate.

In that decision the apparent conflict in the provisions of C. S., 463 (Rev. 419), and C. S., 464 (formerly Rev. 420),…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cecil v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Brown Ex Rel. Webb v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Steele v. Commissioners of RutherfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  4. McFadden v. . Maxwell, Comr. of RevenueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. Kellis v. . WelchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Coats v. Sampson County Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Godfrey v. Tidewater Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. Austin v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Powell v. Eastern Carolina Regional Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Frink v. BattenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API