Godfrey v. Tidewater Power Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.
Is the city of New Bern, a municipal corporation, located in Craven County, where the plaintiff’s alleged cause of action arose, entitled as a matter of right to have the action removed from Mecklenburg County, where plaintiff resides, to Craven County for trial, when the plaintiff makes no allegation and seeks no relief against the city, and it is brought into the action as a party defendant on motion and cross action of an original defendant, Tidewater Power Company, for contribution as a joint tort-feasor in the event it, the Power Company, be held liable to plaintiff? The court below did…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- In Re SteelmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Nance v. Southern RailwaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Cecil v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Jones v. Town of StatesvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Steele v. Commissioners of RutherfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Regents of University of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Coats v. Sampson County Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Lichtenfels v. North Carolina National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Tudesque v. New Mexico State Board of Barber ExaminersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
- Ebenezer Society v. Minnesota State Board of HealthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.