Legal Opinion

Texas Employers' Ins. v. Peterson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 2, 1923No. 2139PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKlett, J.

The Texas Employers’ Insurance Association has appealed from a judgment rendered by the district court of Wichita county in favor of appellees, Charles P. Peterson and wife, Eddie Peterson, for á lump sum compensation allowed them as dependents of their son, Rufus A. Peterson, who was killed while in the employment of the Gulf Production Company. The appellant questions the sufficiency of the evidence to support the affirmative answer of the jury to the following special issues submitted to the jury:

“(1) Were the claimants, Charles P. Peterson and Mrs. E. Peterson, as parents of Rufus…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lumberman's Reciprocal Ass'n. v. BehnkenTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Lumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'n v. WarnerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  3. Southern Surety Co. v. HibbsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Millers' Indemnity Underwriters v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Burns v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1922

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Texas Employers' Ins. v. JimenezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  2. Clover Fork Coal Company v. AyresCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  3. Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  4. Postal Mut. Indemnity Co. v. PennCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  5. Georgia Casualty Co. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API