Legal Opinion

Burns v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 4, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeach, J.

The plaintiff applied for and was awarded compensation as a partial dependent on her son, Robert T. Burns, who died as the result of an injury arising out of and in the course of his employment by the defendant.

The reasons of appeal relate to the conclusion that upon the facts found the plaintiff was a partial dependent on the deceased; and to the extent of the dependency, if any.

As to the conclusion of partial dependency, the defendant relies on Atwood v. Connecticut Light & Power Co., 95 Conn. 669, 112 Atl. 269, in which we said, p. 676, that “the finding is not susceptible of other…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Atwood v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Texas Employers' Ins. v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  2. O'Dea v. Chicago Bridge & Iron WorksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  3. Morrill v. Hartford Painting & Decorating Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API