Legal Opinion
Abramson v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 21, 1997No. 96-338CPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MILLER, Judge.
Plaintiffs, supervisory employees of the United States Government Printing Office (the “GPO”), filed an action in this court seeking overtime compensation and liquidated damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 260 (1994). Plaintiffs’ claim is predicated on the contention that the GPO was not permitted legally to change its practice of paying overtime to supervisors by granting compensatory time off. This decision was effected by Notice 640-305 (June 5, 1995) (the “notice”).
In July 1997, while undertaking discovery, plaintiffs’ counsel deposed Edward Blatt,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Senate of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico on Behalf of Judiciary Committee v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- William Jordan v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Vons Companies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Marriott International Resorts, L.P., and Marriott International Jbs Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Dairyland Power Cooperative v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- First Heights Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.