Carr v. King
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Perry Superior Court. — W. W. Cardbll, Judge. Action in replevin resulted in judgment for the possession of the property in controversy, or, in lieu thereof, its value. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
The plaintiff claims to be the absolute owner of three pool tables and accompanying balls, cues, racks, a card table, gas tank, ice box, and billiard pocket blocks, and sued out a writ of replevin for the possession thereof. The cause of detention was alleged to have been the sale of the property upon execution, issued on judgment entered in the justice court of Esquire Smith, without jurisdiction, as is alleged. The answer was a general denial.
1. Justices of the peace: invalid original notice. I. It appears from the record that execution did is-' sue, and that the property was sold…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Campbell v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
- Priestman v. PriestmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Bristol Savings Bank v. JuddSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Coffin v. GephartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
- Sigler v. MurphySupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Swift v. SwiftSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
- Marx Truck Line, Inc. v. FredricksenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- State v. RosenbergSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
- Finegold v. Union Outfitting Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1923
- Harlan v. MennengaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.