Board of Metropolitan Police v. Board of Auditors
Michigan Supreme Court
Application for mandamus to compel respondents to pay the expense of patrolling certain territory in townships outside of Detroit, under the liquor law of 1887. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
This is an application to compel the respondents to pay out of the treasury of Wayne county the expense claimed by relators to have been incurred in patrolling certain territory in the townships outside of Detroit under section 33 of Act No. 313, Laws of 1887, popularly known as the “Liquor Law.” A defense was put in by respondents to the effect that no duty such as that statute purports to lay upon them can be legally enforced. The argument was chiefly based on grounds independent of those affecting the constitutional objections applicable to other questions arising on the law, and the case…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- Allor v. Board of AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Attorney General v. Board of CouncilmenMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ex parte CorlissNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
- Wilson v. BowenMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- O'Leary v. Board of Fire & Water CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Board of Education v. Superintendent of Public InstructionMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- State ex rel. Harte v. MoorheadNebraska Supreme Court · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.