Legal Opinion

Strand Electric Service Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 27, 1988No. 754-85LPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SMITH, Chief Judge.

This order addresses defendant’s motion under RUSCC 41(b) to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute its claim. No response either consenting or objecting to this motion has been filed by plaintiff. While this court is generally reluctant to dismiss a case without a review on the merits, this court is compelled to grant defendant’s motion and dismiss plaintiff’s complaint in light of the foregoing circumstances.

Background

Plaintiff's complaint was filed on December 23, 1985. The complaint requested compensation for the government’s allegedly…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Kadin Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  3. Reading Anthracite Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
  4. First State Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  5. Strand Electric Service Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burbank College of Court Reporting, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  2. Advance America Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
  3. Gruntz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API