Strand Electric Service Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SMITH, Chief Judge.
This order addresses defendant’s motion under RUSCC 41(b) to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute its claim. No response either consenting or objecting to this motion has been filed by plaintiff. While this court is generally reluctant to dismiss a case without a review on the merits, this court is compelled to grant defendant’s motion and dismiss plaintiff’s complaint in light of the foregoing circumstances.
Background
Plaintiff's complaint was filed on December 23, 1985. The complaint requested compensation for the government’s allegedly…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Kadin Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Reading Anthracite Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
- First State Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Strand Electric Service Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Burbank College of Court Reporting, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Advance America Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
- Gruntz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022