Legal Opinion
Strand Electric Service Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided October 9, 1987No. 754-85LPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff has come before this court requesting a motion for summary judgment. The motion itself is one paragraph long and simply states that based “on the pleadings, evidence and affidavits on file that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that plaintiff is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment at 1. The motion also came attached to approximately 500 pages of evidence and affidavits.
Defendant replied under RUSCC 7(b)(1) in order to require plaintiff to resubmit the summary judgment motion so as to include…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. 64.88 Acres of LandDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
- Chicago and North Western Railway Company v. Norbert W. Britten, Special Administrator of the Estate of Joyce G. Britten, Chicago and North Western Railway Company v. Marilyn A. Britten, a Minor, by Norbert W. Britten, Her Father, and Next Friend, Chicago and North Western Railway Company v. Jeanette L. Britten, a Minor, by Norbert W. Britten, Her Father and Next FriendCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Bartholomew v. PortDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1970
3Cited by2 opinions
- Strand Electric Service Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Bradfield v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996