Legal Opinion
Associated Piping & Engineering Co. v. Jones
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 15, 1936No. Civ. 10901PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WHITE, J., pro tem.
The plaintiff brought this action against C. E. Jones, George A. Mott and A. E. Austin, individually and as copartners doing business under the firm name of J & M Manufacturing Company, to recover a balance due for merchandise sold and delivered, money advanced to, and services performed for defendants. From a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff, defendant A. E. Austin appeals.
On the 12th day of December, 1934, the defendants entered into an agreement which reads as follows:
“THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this 12th day of December, 1934, by and between Aubrey…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Westcott v. GilmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Tuttle v. BlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- San Joaquin Light & Power Corp. v. CostaloupesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Chapman v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hoffman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1943
- Constans v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Dills v. Delira Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1956
- Kaufman-Brown Potato Co. v. LongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- California Employment Stabilization Commission v. WaltersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.