Legal Opinion

Barry Doe v. David Meron

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided July 3, 2019No. 18-2024PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judge:

Barry Doe claims officers of the United States Navy and employees of the Department of Defense ("DOD") conspired to seize, interrogate and batter his three minor children and to seize and batter him. In response, Doe, individually and on behalf of his three minor children, (collectively "Doe") sued those officers and employees alleging intentional torts under state law and constitutional violations under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 , 91 S.Ct. 1999 , 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).

The district court dismissed Doe's claims…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Ziglar v. AbbasiSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  5. United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Joseph Mays v. T. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
  2. Walton Campbell v. Ryan McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  3. ANDERSON v. DIAMONDBACK INVESTMENT GROUP, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2023
  4. Akacem v. GarciaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
  5. Aldabe v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API