Legal Opinion

Chicago Directory Co. v. United States Directory Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 22, 1903PublishedCited by 9 opinions

On Motion to Commit Defendants Dwyer and Fallon for Contempt of Court. '

1Opinion of the Court

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The affiant Harry S. Spidell, being absent in Pittsburg, was not produced and tendered to defendants for cross-examination. For that reason his affidavit and the affidavits filed by defendants in answer to it have not been considered, and are no part of the record upon which this decision is based. They may be withdrawn by the parties presenting them.

There are many contradictions in the affidavits presented by the respective parties; but a careful review of the whole case, and an analysis of the evidence afforded by the documents on file, has clearly convinced the court…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Merchants' Stock & Grain Co. v. Board of Trade of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  2. Bowles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
  3. In re FellermanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1906
  4. Phillips Sheet & Tin Plate Co. v. Amalgamated Ass'n of Iron, Steel & Tin WorkersDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1913
  5. In re SteinerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API