Legal Opinion

Mcintyre v. Sonoma Valley Unified School District

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 1, 2012No. A131327PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUVOLO, P. J.

I

INTRODUCTION

Dawn McIntyre (McIntyre), a former employee of the Sonoma Valley Unified School District (the District), filed a petition for writ of mandate (Code Civ. Proc., § 1085) to compel the District to reinstate her as a permanent tenured teacher. The primary issue in this case is whether the District had a mandatory duty under the Education Code to classify McIntyre as a “probationary” employee rather than as a “temporary” employee. Whether McIntyre was properly classified as “temporary” instead of “probationary” is a matter of some consequence because a teacher’s…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Shamblin v. BrattainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Kavanaugh v. West Sonoma County Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Weathers v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Balen v. Peralta Junior College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Henderson v. Newport-Mesa Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Welco Electronics, Inc. v. MoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Fowler v. City of LafayetteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Fowler v. City of LafayetteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Hamilton and High LLC v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API