Anderson v. Neal Institutes Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Frank J. Murasky, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This is an. appeal by plaintiff from a judgment entered in favor of defendants upon an order sustaining a general demurrer to plaintiff’s amended and supplemental complaint without leave to amend.
The facts as alleged in the complaint, stripped of legal verbiage, are substantially as follows: The defendant, Neal Institutes Company, has been for several years continuously engaged in the business of preparing and distributing certain medical remedies, known as the Neal remedies, for the treatment of patients addicted to the excessive use of alcoholic liquors and pernicious drugs; and it…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Welty v. JacobsIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Spreckels v. Hawaiian Commercial & Sugar Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Farnum v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- McCaull v. BrahamU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1883
- Myers v. Steel Machine Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Long Beach Drug Co. v. United Drug Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Poultry Producers of Southern California, Inc. v. BarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- O'Brien v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Hunter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Nadell & Co. v. GrassoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.