Spreckels v. Hawaiian Commercial & Sugar Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco refusing to dissolve a temporary injunction. James M. Trout, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
This is an appeal from an order refusing to dissolve a temporary injunction restraining the corporate defendant from further prosecuting an action already commenced by said defendant against the plaintiff in the courts of the Republic of Hawaii, and to prevent the other defendants, as directors of the corporate defendant, from furthering the prosecution of said action.
Defendants moved to dissolve the injunction upon the complaint without answer or counter-affidavit. They contend: 1. That the complaint does not state a cause of action; and 2. That the courts of this state cannot restrain…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Anthony v. DunlapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Uhlfelder v. LevyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
3Cited by27 opinions
- Modern Barber Colleges, Inc. v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Reclamation District No. 1500 v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Whitten v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Advanced Bionics Corp. v. Medtronic, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Estate of BarnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.