State v. Wilson

OPINION

SPIESS, Chief Judge.

Defendant was convicted upon two •charges of knowingly issuing and transferring forged writings, namely, checks, with intent to injure and defraud. He is now in custody under a sentence imposed by the court. He has appealed to this •court from an order denying his motion filed pursuant to Rule 93 [§ 21-1-1(93), N.M.S.A.1953 (Supp.1969)].

The first point asserted by defendant is:

“THAT THE COURT ERRED IN HOLDING THAT THE DEFENDANT’S OBJECTION TO THE JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE, ON THE -GROUNDS THAT HE WAS NOT AFFORDED AN ATTORNEY AT THE ARRAIGNMENT, WAS NOT WELL TAKEN OR…