Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Arthur

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided April 14, 2009No. Civil 6:08CV00028-30PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

NORMAN K. MOON, District Judge.

On September 2, 2008, Plaintiffs James Brooks, Donald Hamlette, and Samuel St. John, all former employees of the Virginia Department of Corrections’ Rustburg Correctional Unit in Rustburg, Virginia, brought suit against their former supervisors at the Rustburg Unit, Defendants Howard Arthur, Sr. and Randal Mitchell, for alleged acts of retaliation in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and for tortious interference with contract. On March 23, 2009, the Defendants filed Motions to Dismiss, arguing that the Plaintiffs’ § 1983 claims are precluded by…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. James Brooks v. Howard Arthur, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  2. Brooks v. ArthurCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  3. Martin-Bangura v. Virginia Department of Mental HealthDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
  4. Ashe v. PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2015
  5. Josephine Lee v. Southside Virginia Training CenterCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API