Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Arthur

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided November 19, 2010No. 09-1551PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KING, Circuit Judge:

In 2008, plaintiffs James Brooks, Donald Hamlette, and Samuel St. John, who were correctional officers for Virginia’s Department of Corrections (the “Department”), initiated these since-consolidated civil actions in the Western District of Virginia, asserting retaliation claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Their respective complaints named as defendants Howard R. Arthur, Sr., and Randal W. Mitchell — the plaintiffs’ supervisors — in their individual capacities. The defendants sought dismissal of the complaints, asserting primarily that the doctrine of res judicata barred…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. University of Tennessee v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Providence Hall Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
  2. James Brooks v. Howard Arthur, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  3. Voss v. Pujdak (In Re Pujdak)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2011
  4. RFT Management Company LLC v. John PowellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  5. Ashe v. PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2015

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API