Brooks v. Arthur
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KING, Circuit Judge:
In 2008, plaintiffs James Brooks, Donald Hamlette, and Samuel St. John, who were correctional officers for Virginia’s Department of Corrections (the “Department”), initiated these since-consolidated civil actions in the Western District of Virginia, asserting retaliation claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Their respective complaints named as defendants Howard R. Arthur, Sr., and Randal W. Mitchell — the plaintiffs’ supervisors — in their individual capacities. The defendants sought dismissal of the complaints, asserting primarily that the doctrine of res judicata barred…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- University of Tennessee v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Providence Hall Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- James Brooks v. Howard Arthur, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Voss v. Pujdak (In Re Pujdak)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2011
- RFT Management Company LLC v. John PowellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Ashe v. PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2015
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.