Commonwealth v. Toritto
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
PANELLA, J.:
We granted en banc review in this case to principally address the issue of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a conviction of accomplice liability for a narcotics transaction. In an interesting development following trial, the jury convicted the Appellant, Joseph Toritto, Jr., under an accomplice theory, but acquitted him of the conspiracy charge. Toritto argues that his mere presence at the time of a drug sale from his cousin to an undercover agent cannot sustain a conviction for accomplice liability. We recognize that a defendant’s association with a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. RegaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Pickett v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Com. v. Spence, O.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- Commonwealth v. GrahamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. MikitiukSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Commonwealth v. EnixSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. ScottSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.