Legal Opinion

Ochinero v. Wertz

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 20, 1962No. Civ. 21PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff Ochinero from an order vacating the default of defendants Fred A. Wertz and Chester E. Wertz pursuant to motion under Code of Civil Procedure, section 473. The third defendant, Marion W. Irons, as to whom the motion was denied, has not appealed.

Defendant Chester Wertz, 63 years of age, farms in Stanislaus County, and his brother, Fred Wertz, aged 65, farms in Butte County. Their codefendant, Marion W. Irons, a self-styled businessman, prevailed upon them to invest in the trading stamp business in the San Joaquin Valley. Mr. Irons negotiated a contract for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Griffith Co. v. San Diego College for WomenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. La Jolla Casa deManana v. HopkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Stegge v. WilkersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Etchepare v. EhmkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Hodge Sheet Metal Products v. Palm Springs Riviera HotelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Uva v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Transit Ads, Inc. v. Tanner Motor Livery, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Davis v. ThayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Slusher v. DurrerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Ford v. HerndonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API