Legal Opinion
Skvorak v. Berryhill
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 28, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2016-0044PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge
In this action seeking benefits from the Social Security Administration, the sole remaining issue relates to Plaintiff Garth Skvorak’s attorney fees. On July 10, 2017, Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey, to whom this dispute had been referred for full case management, issued his Report and Recommendation regarding Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney’s Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Finding the amount sought reasonable, he recommended that Plaintiffs request for- fees be granted. The Magistrate Judge,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Astrue v. RatliffSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Murkeldove v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Turner v. Commissioner of Social SEC.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Demetra Baylor v. Mitchell Rubenstein & AssociatCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brooks v. ColvinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Jillian Virginia Lagasse v. Nancy Berryhill, Acting Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2018
- Lester v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2023