Legal Opinion

Muffett v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 25, 1982No. WCB Case No. 80-00805, CA A23392PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.

Claimant appeals the denial of his claim for a bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome. One of his assignments of error is that the Board erred in refusing to remand the claim to the referee for admission of an exhibit that was not available to claimant until after the opinion and order of the referee was issued. The exhibit was in the form of a letter dated June. 25, 1980, from Dr. Stolzberg to Dr. Silver. In pertinent part, it stated:

“I disagree most strongly with Doctor Dietrich’s views on the pathogenesis of carpal tunnel syndrome. I think the condition is caused by swelling of the flexor…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mansfield v. CAPLENER BROTHERSCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  2. Holmes v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. Penifold v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Matter of Compensation of GalleaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. Brown v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. SAIF Corp. v. TullCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. Bailey v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Bailey v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Parmer v. Plaid Pantry 54Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. SAIF Corp. v. TullCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API