Legal Opinion

Bailey v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1983No. 77-7554, CA A24892, SC 29294PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*43JONES, J.

This is an appeal from a denial of a claim for workers’ compensation benefits for an alleged occupational disease. The claimant challenges the refusal of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) to remand her case to the referee for the taking of additional evidence. The Court of Appeals affirmed the Board’s ruling.

Claimant was employed at Bramco, Inc., a fiberglass boat manufacturing company, between September, 1974, and April, 1977. In 1976, she was required to perform work using varnish which contained acetone. Initially, this work was done outside, but was subsequently undertaken…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Maumary v. Mayfair MarketsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  2. Penifold v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. Matter of Compensation of GalleaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Brown v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. Muffett v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Allie v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. Steimer v. Boise Cascade Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. Bailey v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Duckett v. Alaska Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. Duckett v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API